Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Arno Bakkeren's avatar

Thank you Wendy for bringing this to my attention.

Crisis asks us to zoom out, but pressure pulls us toward what is urgent and visible. In the crisis decisions I’ve been studying in the public domain, that often means keeping the system running now, while the wider consequences arrive later and through weaker signals.

What I liked in Vic’s story is that she didn’t only “zoom out” in her head. She made it workable for others. That is where one practice matters: Make the reasons travel. When you shut something down, shift funds, or make an exception, leave a short trace others can follow. What are we protecting. Why this now. What are the safeguards. When do we review and return.

Over time, that record does more than support coordination. It makes the ethical work visible. It shows how people justify hard trade-offs when there is no clean option, and it gives others something concrete to question, refine, and learn from without turning the moment into a blame game.

Alex Milovanovich's avatar

The old school deal with crises in a fire-fighting way - reacting to them. My dynamic strategy approach demands adaptive leadership based on constant sensing, scenario building and mitigating potential crises.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?